| InformationBaron.com in·for·ma·tion bar·on n. "One having great wealth, power, and influence in the collection of facts or data" |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| INFORMATION BARON IS YOUR REFERENCE FOR PRIMARY SOURCE NEWS The Purpose Of The Information Baron "My purpose is to provide you with facts supported by references to primary sources rather than opinion absent of fact supported only by surmise, conjecture and speculation." The Information Baron March 30, 2006 QUOTES FROM HISTORY "Beer is proof that God Loves us and wants us to be happy" Benjamin Franklin "Fate is the same for the man who holds back, the same if he fights hard. We are all held in a single honor, the brave with the weaklings. A man dies still if he has done nothing, as one who had done much." Homer, Iliad "We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender." Winston Churchill "We Shall Never Surrender" speech before the House of Commons June 4, 1940 |
||||||||||
| April 4, 2006 View The Competing Immigration Reforms Bill In Their Entirety You’ve heard and seen the debate about immigration reform. Now view the competing immigration reform bills of United States House Of Representatives (H.R. 4437 – “Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005” (Rep. Sensenbrenner, F. James Jr.) and the United States Senate (Senate Bill 2454 – “Securing America’s Borders (Sen. Frist, William H.) and (Senate Bill 1033 – “Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act” (Sen. McCain, John and Sen. Kennedy, Edward M.). Now, you can read each of these competing bills in their entirety by clicking below. H.R. 4437 (Sensenbrenner) S.B. 2454 (Frist) S.B. 1033 (McCain/Kennedy) April 3, 2006 United States Supreme Court Denies Review Of Appeal In Jose Padilla v. C.T. Hanft, United States Navy Commander, Consolidated Naval Brig Today, the United States Supreme Court denied review of the appeal of Jose Padilla v. C.T. Hanft, United States Navy Commander, Consolidated Naval Brig, 547 U.S. ____ (2006). Jose Padilla is a United States Citizen apprehended at Chicago's O'Hare airport after the President issued an order to the Secretary Of Defense designating Padilla as an enemy combatant and ordering his military detention. The instant case arises as a result a petition filed by Padilla on July 2, 2004 requesting he be released immediately or charged with a crime. On February 28, 2005, the District Court of South Carolina granted the petition. On September 9, 2005, the Court Of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the judgment. After filing his petition for review by the U.S. Supreme Court, Padilla was charged with various federal crimes. In denying review, Justice Kennedy wrote "Padilla's current custody is part of the relief he sought." Justice Ginsberg wrote a dissenting opinion dissenting from the denial of the petition. [Click here to read the opinion by Justice Kennedy]. [Click here to read the dissenting opinion by Justice Ginsberg]. March 30, 2006 United Nations Security Council Calls For Iran To Suspend All Nuclear Enrichment Related Activities In its March 29, 2006 session, the United Nations Security Council called for Iran to suspend all nuclear enrichment related and reprocessing activities including research and development. The Council requested that the IAEA provide a report in 30 days to assist in the monitoring of Iran's activities. The Council seeks to determine whether Iran's nuclear program is for "exclusively peaceful purposes." With regard to steps to be taken by the Security Council after 30 days, John Bolton, United States Ambassador to the United Nations stated: "So there’s no ambiguity in what we’re waiting for here – we’re waiting for the Iranians to do what they themselves have said they were going to do and violated and the obligations that they undertook by being a member of the IAEA. Now what will the Iranians do in the next 30 days, I certainly don’t know, but as I said to you earlier, we’re prepared to be back here on the 31st day given the Iranian record to date of consistently flouting the International Atomic Energy Agency attempting to obscure what they’ve done and to continue to pursue nuclear weapons. Now what happens at that point will be the subject of discussions in Berlin tomorrow when Secretary Rice meets with her counterparts, but they will be having a forward looking discussion." [Click here to read Ambassador Bolton's remarks following the Security Council session]. March 29, 2006 Government Investigators Transport Radioactive Material Across Northern And Southern Border Crossings Yesterday, the United States Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs heard testimony on Border Security. Testimony was given by Eugene E. Aloise, Director, Nuclear & Nonproliferation Issues, Natural Resources and Environment , Government Accountability Office; Gregory D. Kutz, Managing Director, Forensic Audits & Special Investigations, Financial Management & Assurance , Government Accountability Office; and Keith A. Rhodes, Chief Technologist, Center for Technology and Engineering , Government Accountability Office. During his testimony, Mr. Kurtz testified that investigators purchased amounts of radioactive material sufficient to manufacture two dirty bombs that would result in small radiation exposures that would not cause death or illness. The investigation involved the purchase of small amounts of radiation from commercial suppliers Washington, D.C. area by posing as employees of a fictitious company in the Washington, D.C. The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether radiation portal monitors would detect radioactive sources carried by investigators, whether border crossing inspectors exercised due diligence in determining the authenticity of papers presented by the investigators and whether a National Regulatory Commission document could be counterfeited by information readily accessible to the public. Mr. Kurtz concluded that investigators purchased, received and transported radioactive sources across the southern and northern borders of the United States with ease. Mr. Kurtz' testimony gives specific details of how investigators were able to accomplish their tasks. The Government Accountability Office investigation into border crossing security was an important test of our nation's ability to deal with border security. However, the investigation and Mr. Kurtz' testimony was conveniently omitted from any of the sources of main stream media. |
||||||||||
CONTACT THE INFORMATION BARON LINKS TO PRIMARY SOURCES U.S Supreme Ct. White House U.S. Senate U.S. House Of Reps. House Committee on Appropriations |
||||||||||